0.04/0.08 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.04/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM 0.08/0.28 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu 0.08/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.08/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.08/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.08/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.08/0.28 % CPULimit : 1920 0.08/0.28 % WCLimit : 240 0.08/0.28 % DateTime : Wed Jul 30 03:45:49 EDT 2025 0.08/0.28 % CPUTime : 0.14/0.38 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.14/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.64xRqrOcac/E---3.1_20233.p 0.14/0.44 # Version: 3.0.0-ho 0.14/0.44 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLLNHSN. 0.14/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.14/0.44 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1200s (5) cores 0.14/0.44 # Starting post_as_ho3 with 240s (1) cores 0.14/0.44 # Starting new_ho_12 with 240s (1) cores 0.14/0.44 # Starting new_bool_2 with 240s (1) cores 0.14/0.44 # post_as_ho3 with pid 20312 completed with status 0 0.14/0.44 # Result found by post_as_ho3 0.14/0.44 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLLNHSN. 0.14/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.14/0.44 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1200s (5) cores 0.14/0.44 # Starting post_as_ho3 with 240s (1) cores 0.14/0.44 # No SInE strategy applied 0.14/0.44 # Search class: HGHNF-FFMF21-SHSSMSBN 0.14/0.44 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 0.14/0.44 # Starting new_ho_9 with 130s (1) cores 0.14/0.44 # new_ho_9 with pid 20317 completed with status 0 0.14/0.44 # Result found by new_ho_9 0.14/0.44 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLLNHSN. 0.14/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.14/0.44 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1200s (5) cores 0.14/0.44 # Starting post_as_ho3 with 240s (1) cores 0.14/0.44 # No SInE strategy applied 0.14/0.44 # Search class: HGHNF-FFMF21-SHSSMSBN 0.14/0.44 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 0.14/0.44 # Starting new_ho_9 with 130s (1) cores 0.14/0.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s 0.14/0.44 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.14/0.44 0.14/0.44 # Proof found! 0.14/0.44 # SZS status Theorem 0.14/0.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_sort1, type, reg: $tType). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_25, type, mnot: ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_26, type, mor: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_28, type, mimplies: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_33, type, mforall_prop: (($i > $o) > $i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_38, type, mbox: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_50, type, mvalid: ($i > $o) > $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_54, type, c: reg > reg > $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_56, type, p: reg > reg > $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_57, type, eq: reg > reg > $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_58, type, o: reg > reg > $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_60, type, ec: reg > reg > $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_61, type, pp: reg > reg > $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_62, type, tpp: reg > reg > $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_63, type, ntpp: reg > reg > $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_64, type, catalunya: reg). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_65, type, france: reg). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_66, type, spain: reg). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_67, type, paris: reg). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_68, type, a: $i > $i > $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_69, type, fool: $i > $i > $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_70, type, esk1_0: $i). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_71, type, esk2_0: $i). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_72, type, esk3_1: reg > reg). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_73, type, esk4_1: reg > reg). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_76, type, esk7_2: $i > ($i > $o) > $i). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_77, type, esk8_0: reg). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_78, type, esk9_1: reg > reg). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_79, type, esk10_1: reg > reg). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_80, type, esk11_0: reg). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_81, type, esk12_0: reg). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_82, type, esk13_1: reg > reg). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_83, type, esk14_1: reg > reg). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_84, type, esk15_1: reg > reg). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_85, type, esk16_1: reg > reg). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_90, type, epred5_0: $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_91, type, epred6_0: $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_92, type, epred7_0: $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_93, type, epred8_0: $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_94, type, epred9_0: $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_95, type, epred10_0: $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_96, type, epred11_0: $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_97, type, epred12_0: $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_100, type, epred15_0: $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_101, type, epred16_0: $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_108, type, epred23_0: $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(decl_109, type, epred24_0: $o). 0.14/0.44 thf(o, axiom, ((o)=(^[X25:reg, X26:reg]:(?[X22:reg]:(((p @ X22 @ X25)&(p @ X22 @ X26)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.64xRqrOcac/E---3.1_20233.p', o)). 0.14/0.44 thf(p, axiom, ((p)=(^[X20:reg, X21:reg]:(![X22:reg]:(((c @ X22 @ X20)=>(c @ X22 @ X21)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.64xRqrOcac/E---3.1_20233.p', p)). 0.14/0.44 thf(ec, axiom, ((ec)=(^[X29:reg, X30:reg]:(((c @ X29 @ X30)&~((o @ X29 @ X30)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.64xRqrOcac/E---3.1_20233.p', ec)). 0.14/0.44 thf(pp, axiom, ((pp)=(^[X31:reg, X32:reg]:(((p @ X31 @ X32)&~((p @ X32 @ X31)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.64xRqrOcac/E---3.1_20233.p', pp)). 0.14/0.44 thf(ntpp, axiom, ((ntpp)=(^[X35:reg, X36:reg]:(((pp @ X35 @ X36)&~(?[X22:reg]:(((ec @ X22 @ X35)&(ec @ X22 @ X36)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.64xRqrOcac/E---3.1_20233.p', ntpp)). 0.14/0.44 thf(eq, axiom, ((eq)=(^[X23:reg, X24:reg]:(((p @ X23 @ X24)&(p @ X24 @ X23))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.64xRqrOcac/E---3.1_20233.p', eq)). 0.14/0.44 thf(tpp, axiom, ((tpp)=(^[X33:reg, X34:reg]:(((pp @ X33 @ X34)&?[X22:reg]:(((ec @ X22 @ X33)&(ec @ X22 @ X34))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.64xRqrOcac/E---3.1_20233.p', tpp)). 0.14/0.44 thf(mimplies, axiom, ((mimplies)=(^[X6:$i > $o, X7:$i > $o]:(mor @ (mnot @ X6) @ X7))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.64xRqrOcac/E---3.1_20233.p', mimplies)). 0.14/0.44 thf(mnot, axiom, ((mnot)=(^[X6:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(~((X6 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.64xRqrOcac/E---3.1_20233.p', mnot)). 0.14/0.44 thf(mor, axiom, ((mor)=(^[X6:$i > $o, X7:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(((X6 @ X3)|(X7 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.64xRqrOcac/E---3.1_20233.p', mor)). 0.14/0.44 thf(mbox, axiom, ((mbox)=(^[X13:$i > $i > $o, X6:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(![X14:$i]:((~((X13 @ X3 @ X14))|(X6 @ X14)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.64xRqrOcac/E---3.1_20233.p', mbox)). 0.14/0.44 thf(mvalid, axiom, ((mvalid)=(^[X6:$i > $o]:(![X3:$i]:((X6 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.64xRqrOcac/E---3.1_20233.p', mvalid)). 0.14/0.44 thf(mforall_prop, axiom, ((mforall_prop)=(^[X9:($i > $o) > $i > $o, X3:$i]:(![X10:$i > $o]:((X9 @ X10 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.64xRqrOcac/E---3.1_20233.p', mforall_prop)). 0.14/0.44 thf(ax3, axiom, (mvalid @ (mbox @ a @ (^[X43:$i]:((ntpp @ paris @ france))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.64xRqrOcac/E---3.1_20233.p', ax3)). 0.14/0.44 thf(con, conjecture, (mvalid @ (mbox @ a @ (^[X40:$i]:(~((eq @ catalunya @ paris)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.64xRqrOcac/E---3.1_20233.p', con)). 0.14/0.44 thf(ax1, axiom, (mvalid @ (mbox @ a @ (^[X44:$i]:((tpp @ catalunya @ spain))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.64xRqrOcac/E---3.1_20233.p', ax1)). 0.14/0.44 thf(t_axiom_for_fool, axiom, (mvalid @ (mforall_prop @ (^[X42:$i > $o]:(mimplies @ (mbox @ fool @ X42) @ X42)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.64xRqrOcac/E---3.1_20233.p', t_axiom_for_fool)). 0.14/0.44 thf(ax2, axiom, (mvalid @ (mbox @ fool @ (^[X41:$i]:((ec @ spain @ france))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.64xRqrOcac/E---3.1_20233.p', ax2)). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_symmetric, axiom, ![X38:reg, X39:reg]:(((c @ X39 @ X38)<=(c @ X38 @ X39))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.64xRqrOcac/E---3.1_20233.p', c_symmetric)). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_19, plain, ((o)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(?[X22:reg]:(((![X53:reg]:(((c @ X53 @ X22)=>(c @ X53 @ Z0))))&(![X54:reg]:(((c @ X54 @ X22)=>(c @ X54 @ Z1))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[o])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_20, plain, ((p)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(![X22:reg]:(((c @ X22 @ Z0)=>(c @ X22 @ Z1)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_21, plain, ((ec)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((c @ Z0 @ Z1)&~((?[X60:reg]:(((![X61:reg]:(((c @ X61 @ X60)=>(c @ X61 @ Z0))))&(![X62:reg]:(((c @ X62 @ X60)=>(c @ X62 @ Z1)))))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ec])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_22, plain, ((o)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(?[X22:reg]:(((![X53:reg]:(((c @ X53 @ X22)=>(c @ X53 @ Z0))))&(![X54:reg]:(((c @ X54 @ X22)=>(c @ X54 @ Z1))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_23, plain, ((pp)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((![X63:reg]:(((c @ X63 @ Z0)=>(c @ X63 @ Z1))))&~((![X64:reg]:(((c @ X64 @ Z1)=>(c @ X64 @ Z0))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[pp])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_24, plain, ((ntpp)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((((![X73:reg]:(((c @ X73 @ Z0)=>(c @ X73 @ Z1))))&~((![X74:reg]:(((c @ X74 @ Z1)=>(c @ X74 @ Z0)))))))&~(?[X22:reg]:(((((c @ X22 @ Z0)&~((?[X75:reg]:(((![X76:reg]:(((c @ X76 @ X75)=>(c @ X76 @ X22))))&(![X77:reg]:(((c @ X77 @ X75)=>(c @ X77 @ Z0))))))))))&(((c @ X22 @ Z1)&~((?[X78:reg]:(((![X79:reg]:(((c @ X79 @ X78)=>(c @ X79 @ X22))))&(![X80:reg]:(((c @ X80 @ X78)=>(c @ X80 @ Z1))))))))))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ntpp])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_25, plain, ((ec)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((c @ Z0 @ Z1)&~((?[X60:reg]:(((![X61:reg]:(((c @ X61 @ X60)=>(c @ X61 @ Z0))))&(![X62:reg]:(((c @ X62 @ X60)=>(c @ X62 @ Z1)))))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_26, plain, ((pp)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((![X63:reg]:(((c @ X63 @ Z0)=>(c @ X63 @ Z1))))&~((![X64:reg]:(((c @ X64 @ Z1)=>(c @ X64 @ Z0))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_20])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_27, plain, ((eq)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((![X51:reg]:(((c @ X51 @ Z0)=>(c @ X51 @ Z1))))&(![X52:reg]:(((c @ X52 @ Z1)=>(c @ X52 @ Z0)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[eq])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_28, plain, ((tpp)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((((![X65:reg]:(((c @ X65 @ Z0)=>(c @ X65 @ Z1))))&~((![X66:reg]:(((c @ X66 @ Z1)=>(c @ X66 @ Z0)))))))&?[X22:reg]:(((((c @ X22 @ Z0)&~((?[X67:reg]:(((![X68:reg]:(((c @ X68 @ X67)=>(c @ X68 @ X22))))&(![X69:reg]:(((c @ X69 @ X67)=>(c @ X69 @ Z0))))))))))&(((c @ X22 @ Z1)&~((?[X70:reg]:(((![X71:reg]:(((c @ X71 @ X70)=>(c @ X71 @ X22))))&(![X72:reg]:(((c @ X72 @ X70)=>(c @ X72 @ Z1)))))))))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[tpp])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_29, plain, ((mimplies)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(((~((Z0 @ Z2)))|(Z1 @ Z2))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mimplies])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_30, plain, ((mnot)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i]:(~((Z0 @ Z1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mnot])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_31, plain, ((mor)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(((Z0 @ Z2)|(Z1 @ Z2))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mor])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_32, plain, ((mbox)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(![X14:$i]:((~((Z0 @ Z2 @ X14))|(Z1 @ X14)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mbox])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_33, plain, ((mvalid)=(^[Z0/* 6 */:$i > $o]:(![X3:$i]:((Z0 @ X3))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mvalid])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_34, plain, ((ntpp)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((((![X73:reg]:(((c @ X73 @ Z0)=>(c @ X73 @ Z1))))&~((![X74:reg]:(((c @ X74 @ Z1)=>(c @ X74 @ Z0)))))))&~(?[X22:reg]:(((((c @ X22 @ Z0)&~((?[X75:reg]:(((![X76:reg]:(((c @ X76 @ X75)=>(c @ X76 @ X22))))&(![X77:reg]:(((c @ X77 @ X75)=>(c @ X77 @ Z0))))))))))&(((c @ X22 @ Z1)&~((?[X78:reg]:(((![X79:reg]:(((c @ X79 @ X78)=>(c @ X79 @ X22))))&(![X80:reg]:(((c @ X80 @ X78)=>(c @ X80 @ Z1))))))))))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_25]), c_0_26])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_35, plain, ((eq)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((![X51:reg]:(((c @ X51 @ Z0)=>(c @ X51 @ Z1))))&(![X52:reg]:(((c @ X52 @ Z1)=>(c @ X52 @ Z0)))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_20])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_36, plain, ((tpp)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((((![X65:reg]:(((c @ X65 @ Z0)=>(c @ X65 @ Z1))))&~((![X66:reg]:(((c @ X66 @ Z1)=>(c @ X66 @ Z0)))))))&?[X22:reg]:(((((c @ X22 @ Z0)&~((?[X67:reg]:(((![X68:reg]:(((c @ X68 @ X67)=>(c @ X68 @ X22))))&(![X69:reg]:(((c @ X69 @ X67)=>(c @ X69 @ Z0))))))))))&(((c @ X22 @ Z1)&~((?[X70:reg]:(((![X71:reg]:(((c @ X71 @ X70)=>(c @ X71 @ X22))))&(![X72:reg]:(((c @ X72 @ X70)=>(c @ X72 @ Z1)))))))))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_25]), c_0_26])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_37, plain, ((mimplies)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(((~((Z0 @ Z2)))|(Z1 @ Z2))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_30]), c_0_31])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_38, plain, ((mforall_prop)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:($i > $o) > $i > $o, Z1:$i]:(![X10:$i > $o]:((Z0 @ X10 @ Z1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mforall_prop])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_39, plain, ![X112:$i, X111:$i]:((~(a @ X112 @ X111)|((![X102:reg]:(((c @ X102 @ paris)=>(c @ X102 @ france)))&~(![X103:reg]:(((c @ X103 @ france)=>(c @ X103 @ paris)))))&~(?[X104:reg]:((((c @ X104 @ paris)&~(?[X105:reg]:((![X106:reg]:(((c @ X106 @ X105)=>(c @ X106 @ X104)))&![X107:reg]:(((c @ X107 @ X105)=>(c @ X107 @ paris)))))))&((c @ X104 @ france)&~(?[X108:reg]:((![X109:reg]:(((c @ X109 @ X108)=>(c @ X109 @ X104)))&![X110:reg]:(((c @ X110 @ X108)=>(c @ X110 @ france))))))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax3]), c_0_32]), c_0_33]), c_0_34])])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_40, negated_conjecture, ~(![X84:$i, X83:$i]:((~(a @ X84 @ X83)|~((![X81:reg]:(((c @ X81 @ catalunya)=>(c @ X81 @ paris)))&![X82:reg]:(((c @ X82 @ paris)=>(c @ X82 @ catalunya)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])]), c_0_32]), c_0_33]), c_0_35])])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_41, plain, ![X123:$i, X122:$i]:((~(a @ X123 @ X122)|((![X113:reg]:(((c @ X113 @ catalunya)=>(c @ X113 @ spain)))&~(![X114:reg]:(((c @ X114 @ spain)=>(c @ X114 @ catalunya)))))&?[X115:reg]:((((c @ X115 @ catalunya)&~(?[X116:reg]:((![X117:reg]:(((c @ X117 @ X116)=>(c @ X117 @ X115)))&![X118:reg]:(((c @ X118 @ X116)=>(c @ X118 @ catalunya)))))))&((c @ X115 @ spain)&~(?[X119:reg]:((![X120:reg]:(((c @ X120 @ X119)=>(c @ X120 @ X115)))&![X121:reg]:(((c @ X121 @ X119)=>(c @ X121 @ spain)))))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax1]), c_0_32]), c_0_33]), c_0_36])])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_42, plain, ![X101:$i, X100:$i > $o]:((~(![X99:$i]:((~(fool @ X101 @ X99)|(X100 @ X99))))|(X100 @ X101))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t_axiom_for_fool]), c_0_37]), c_0_38]), c_0_32]), c_0_33])])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_43, plain, ![X148:$i, X149:$i, X150:reg, X152:reg, X154:reg, X155:reg, X157:reg, X158:reg]:((((~(c @ X150 @ paris)|(c @ X150 @ france)|~(a @ X148 @ X149))&(((c @ esk8_0 @ france)|~(a @ X148 @ X149))&(~(c @ esk8_0 @ paris)|~(a @ X148 @ X149))))&(((~(c @ X157 @ (esk10_1 @ X152))|(c @ X157 @ X152)|~(c @ X152 @ france)|(~(c @ X154 @ (esk9_1 @ X152))|(c @ X154 @ X152)|~(c @ X152 @ paris))|~(a @ X148 @ X149))&(~(c @ X158 @ (esk10_1 @ X152))|(c @ X158 @ france)|~(c @ X152 @ france)|(~(c @ X154 @ (esk9_1 @ X152))|(c @ X154 @ X152)|~(c @ X152 @ paris))|~(a @ X148 @ X149)))&((~(c @ X157 @ (esk10_1 @ X152))|(c @ X157 @ X152)|~(c @ X152 @ france)|(~(c @ X155 @ (esk9_1 @ X152))|(c @ X155 @ paris)|~(c @ X152 @ paris))|~(a @ X148 @ X149))&(~(c @ X158 @ (esk10_1 @ X152))|(c @ X158 @ france)|~(c @ X152 @ france)|(~(c @ X155 @ (esk9_1 @ X152))|(c @ X155 @ paris)|~(c @ X152 @ paris))|~(a @ X148 @ X149)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_39])])])])])])])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_44, plain, (~((epred8_0))<=>![X3:$i, X14:$i]:(~((a @ X3 @ X14)))), introduced(definition)). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_45, negated_conjecture, ![X129:reg, X130:reg]:(((a @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)&((~(c @ X129 @ catalunya)|(c @ X129 @ paris))&(~(c @ X130 @ paris)|(c @ X130 @ catalunya))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_40])])])])])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_46, plain, ![X159:$i, X160:$i, X161:reg, X164:reg, X167:reg]:((((~(c @ X161 @ catalunya)|(c @ X161 @ spain)|~(a @ X159 @ X160))&(((c @ esk11_0 @ spain)|~(a @ X159 @ X160))&(~(c @ esk11_0 @ catalunya)|~(a @ X159 @ X160))))&((((c @ esk12_0 @ catalunya)|~(a @ X159 @ X160))&((((c @ (esk14_1 @ X164) @ X164)|(c @ (esk13_1 @ X164) @ X164)|~(a @ X159 @ X160))&(~(c @ (esk14_1 @ X164) @ catalunya)|(c @ (esk13_1 @ X164) @ X164)|~(a @ X159 @ X160)))&(((c @ (esk14_1 @ X164) @ X164)|~(c @ (esk13_1 @ X164) @ esk12_0)|~(a @ X159 @ X160))&(~(c @ (esk14_1 @ X164) @ catalunya)|~(c @ (esk13_1 @ X164) @ esk12_0)|~(a @ X159 @ X160)))))&(((c @ esk12_0 @ spain)|~(a @ X159 @ X160))&((((c @ (esk16_1 @ X167) @ X167)|(c @ (esk15_1 @ X167) @ X167)|~(a @ X159 @ X160))&(~(c @ (esk16_1 @ X167) @ spain)|(c @ (esk15_1 @ X167) @ X167)|~(a @ X159 @ X160)))&(((c @ (esk16_1 @ X167) @ X167)|~(c @ (esk15_1 @ X167) @ esk12_0)|~(a @ X159 @ X160))&(~(c @ (esk16_1 @ X167) @ spain)|~(c @ (esk15_1 @ X167) @ esk12_0)|~(a @ X159 @ X160)))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_41])])])])])])])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_47, plain, (~((epred10_0))<=>![X3:$i, X14:$i]:(~((a @ X3 @ X14)))), introduced(definition)). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_48, plain, ![X89:$i, X88:$i]:((~(fool @ X89 @ X88)|((c @ spain @ france)&~(?[X85:reg]:((![X86:reg]:(((c @ X86 @ X85)=>(c @ X86 @ spain)))&![X87:reg]:(((c @ X87 @ X85)=>(c @ X87 @ france))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax2]), c_0_32]), c_0_33]), c_0_25])])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_49, plain, (~((epred16_0))<=>![X3:$i, X14:$i]:(~((fool @ X3 @ X14)))), introduced(definition)). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_50, plain, ![X145:$i, X146:$i > $o]:((((fool @ X145 @ (esk7_2 @ X145 @ X146))|(X146 @ X145))&(~(X146 @ (esk7_2 @ X145 @ X146))|(X146 @ X145)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_42])])])])])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_51, plain, (~((epred7_0))<=>![X18:reg]:(((c @ X18 @ france)|~((c @ X18 @ paris))))), introduced(definition)). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_52, plain, ![X18:reg, X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((c @ X18 @ france)|~((c @ X18 @ paris))|~((a @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_53, plain, ![X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((epred8_0)|~((a @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_44])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_54, negated_conjecture, (a @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_45])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_55, plain, ![X38:reg, X39:reg]:(((c @ X38 @ X39)=>(c @ X39 @ X38))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_symmetric])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_56, plain, (~((epred6_0))<=>![X3:$i, X14:$i]:(~((fool @ X3 @ X14)))), introduced(definition)). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_57, plain, (~((epred9_0))<=>![X18:reg]:(((c @ X18 @ spain)|~((c @ X18 @ catalunya))))), introduced(definition)). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_58, plain, ![X18:reg, X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((c @ X18 @ spain)|~((c @ X18 @ catalunya))|~((a @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_46])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_59, plain, ![X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((epred10_0)|~((a @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_47])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_60, plain, (~((epred12_0))<=>![X3:$i, X14:$i]:(~((fool @ X3 @ X14)))), introduced(definition)). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_61, plain, ![X131:$i, X132:$i, X133:reg]:((((c @ spain @ france)|~(fool @ X131 @ X132))&((((c @ (esk4_1 @ X133) @ X133)|(c @ (esk3_1 @ X133) @ X133)|~(fool @ X131 @ X132))&(~(c @ (esk4_1 @ X133) @ france)|(c @ (esk3_1 @ X133) @ X133)|~(fool @ X131 @ X132)))&(((c @ (esk4_1 @ X133) @ X133)|~(c @ (esk3_1 @ X133) @ spain)|~(fool @ X131 @ X132))&(~(c @ (esk4_1 @ X133) @ france)|~(c @ (esk3_1 @ X133) @ spain)|~(fool @ X131 @ X132)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_48])])])])])])])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_62, plain, ![X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((epred16_0)|~((fool @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_49])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_63, plain, ![X4:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(((fool @ X3 @ (esk7_2 @ X3 @ X4))|(X4 @ X3))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_50])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_64, plain, (~((epred8_0))|~((epred7_0))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_52, c_0_51]), c_0_44])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_65, negated_conjecture, (epred8_0), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53, c_0_54])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_66, plain, ![X125:reg, X126:reg]:((~(c @ X125 @ X126)|(c @ X126 @ X125))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_55])])])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_67, plain, ![X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((epred6_0)|~((fool @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_56])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_68, plain, (~((epred10_0))|~((epred9_0))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_58, c_0_57]), c_0_47])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_69, negated_conjecture, (epred10_0), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59, c_0_54])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_70, plain, ![X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((epred12_0)|~((fool @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_60])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_71, plain, (~((epred15_0))<=>![X18:reg]:(((c @ (esk3_1 @ X18) @ X18)|(c @ (esk4_1 @ X18) @ X18)))), introduced(definition)). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_72, plain, ![X18:reg, X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((c @ (esk4_1 @ X18) @ X18)|(c @ (esk3_1 @ X18) @ X18)|~((fool @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_61])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_73, plain, ![X4:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(((X4 @ X3)|(epred16_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_62, c_0_63])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_74, plain, (~((epred24_0))<=>![X3:$i, X14:$i]:(~((fool @ X3 @ X14)))), introduced(definition)). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_75, plain, ![X18:reg]:(((c @ X18 @ france)|(epred7_0)|~((c @ X18 @ paris)))), inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_51])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_76, plain, ~((epred7_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_64, c_0_65])])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_77, negated_conjecture, ![X18:reg]:(((c @ X18 @ paris)|~((c @ X18 @ catalunya)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_45])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_78, plain, ![X18:reg, X19:reg]:(((c @ X19 @ X18)|~((c @ X18 @ X19)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_66])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_79, plain, (~((epred5_0))<=>![X18:reg]:((~((c @ (esk4_1 @ X18) @ france))|~((c @ (esk3_1 @ X18) @ spain))))), introduced(definition)). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_80, plain, ![X18:reg, X3:$i, X14:$i]:((~((c @ (esk4_1 @ X18) @ france))|~((c @ (esk3_1 @ X18) @ spain))|~((fool @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_61])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_81, plain, ![X4:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(((X4 @ X3)|(epred6_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_67, c_0_63])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_82, plain, ![X18:reg]:(((c @ X18 @ spain)|(epred9_0)|~((c @ X18 @ catalunya)))), inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_57])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_83, plain, ~((epred9_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_68, c_0_69])])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_84, plain, (~((epred11_0))<=>![X18:reg]:(((c @ (esk4_1 @ X18) @ X18)|~((c @ (esk3_1 @ X18) @ spain))))), introduced(definition)). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_85, plain, ![X18:reg, X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((c @ (esk4_1 @ X18) @ X18)|~((c @ (esk3_1 @ X18) @ spain))|~((fool @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_61])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_86, plain, ![X4:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(((X4 @ X3)|(epred12_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_70, c_0_63])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_87, plain, (~((epred16_0))|~((epred15_0))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_72, c_0_71]), c_0_49])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_88, plain, (epred16_0), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_62, c_0_73])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_89, plain, ![X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((epred24_0)|~((fool @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_74])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_90, plain, ![X18:reg]:(((c @ X18 @ france)|~((c @ X18 @ paris)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_75, c_0_76])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_91, negated_conjecture, ![X18:reg]:(((c @ X18 @ paris)|~((c @ catalunya @ X18)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_77, c_0_78])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_92, plain, (~((epred6_0))|~((epred5_0))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_80, c_0_79]), c_0_56])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_93, plain, (epred6_0), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_67, c_0_81])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_94, plain, ![X18:reg]:(((c @ X18 @ spain)|~((c @ X18 @ catalunya)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_82, c_0_83])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_95, negated_conjecture, ![X18:reg]:(((c @ X18 @ catalunya)|~((c @ X18 @ paris)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_45])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_96, plain, (~((epred12_0))|~((epred11_0))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_85, c_0_84]), c_0_60])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_97, plain, (epred12_0), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_70, c_0_86])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_98, plain, ![X18:reg]:(((c @ (esk4_1 @ X18) @ X18)|(c @ (esk3_1 @ X18) @ X18)|(epred15_0))), inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_71])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_99, plain, ~((epred15_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_87, c_0_88])])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_100, plain, (~((epred23_0))<=>![X18:reg]:(((c @ (esk3_1 @ X18) @ X18)|~((c @ (esk4_1 @ X18) @ france))))), introduced(definition)). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_101, plain, ![X18:reg, X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((c @ (esk3_1 @ X18) @ X18)|~((c @ (esk4_1 @ X18) @ france))|~((fool @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_61])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_102, plain, ![X4:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(((X4 @ X3)|(epred24_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_89, c_0_63])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_103, plain, ![X18:reg]:(((epred5_0)|~((c @ (esk4_1 @ X18) @ france))|~((c @ (esk3_1 @ X18) @ spain)))), inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_79])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_104, negated_conjecture, ![X18:reg]:(((c @ X18 @ france)|~((c @ catalunya @ X18)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_90, c_0_91])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_105, plain, ~((epred5_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_92, c_0_93])])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_106, plain, ![X18:reg]:(((c @ (esk4_1 @ X18) @ X18)|(epred11_0)|~((c @ (esk3_1 @ X18) @ spain)))), inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_84])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_107, negated_conjecture, ![X18:reg]:(((c @ X18 @ spain)|~((c @ X18 @ paris)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_94, c_0_95])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_108, plain, ~((epred11_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_96, c_0_97])])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_109, negated_conjecture, ![X18:reg]:(((c @ catalunya @ X18)|~((c @ X18 @ paris)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_78, c_0_95])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_110, plain, ![X18:reg]:(((c @ (esk3_1 @ X18) @ X18)|(c @ (esk4_1 @ X18) @ X18))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_98, c_0_99])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_111, plain, (~((epred24_0))|~((epred23_0))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_101, c_0_100]), c_0_74])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_112, plain, (epred24_0), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_89, c_0_102])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_113, negated_conjecture, ![X18:reg]:((~((c @ (esk3_1 @ X18) @ spain))|~((c @ catalunya @ (esk4_1 @ X18))))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_103, c_0_104]), c_0_105])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_114, negated_conjecture, ![X18:reg]:(((c @ (esk4_1 @ X18) @ X18)|~((c @ (esk3_1 @ X18) @ paris)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_106, c_0_107]), c_0_108])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_115, negated_conjecture, ((c @ (esk3_1 @ paris) @ paris)|(c @ catalunya @ (esk4_1 @ paris))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_109, c_0_110])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_116, plain, ![X18:reg]:(((c @ (esk3_1 @ X18) @ X18)|(epred23_0)|~((c @ (esk4_1 @ X18) @ france)))), inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_100])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_117, plain, ~((epred23_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_111, c_0_112])])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_118, negated_conjecture, ![X18:reg]:((~((c @ catalunya @ (esk4_1 @ X18)))|~((c @ (esk3_1 @ X18) @ paris)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_113, c_0_107])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_119, negated_conjecture, (c @ catalunya @ (esk4_1 @ paris)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_109, c_0_114]), c_0_115])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_120, plain, ![X18:reg]:(((c @ (esk3_1 @ X18) @ X18)|~((c @ (esk4_1 @ X18) @ france)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_116, c_0_117])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_121, negated_conjecture, ![X18:reg]:(((c @ france @ X18)|~((c @ catalunya @ X18)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_78, c_0_104])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_122, negated_conjecture, ~((c @ (esk3_1 @ paris) @ paris)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_118, c_0_119])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_123, plain, ![X18:reg]:(((c @ (esk3_1 @ X18) @ X18)|~((c @ france @ (esk4_1 @ X18))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_120, c_0_78])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_124, negated_conjecture, (c @ france @ (esk4_1 @ paris)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_121, c_0_119])). 0.14/0.44 thf(c_0_125, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_122, c_0_123]), c_0_124])]), ['proof']). 0.14/0.44 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.14/0.44 # Parsed axioms : 98 0.14/0.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.14/0.44 # Initial clauses : 85 0.14/0.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 49 0.14/0.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 36 0.14/0.44 # Processed clauses : 470 0.14/0.44 # ...of these trivial : 12 0.14/0.44 # ...subsumed : 99 0.14/0.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 358 0.14/0.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.14/0.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.14/0.44 # Backward-subsumed : 4 0.14/0.44 # Backward-rewritten : 50 0.14/0.44 # Generated clauses : 814 0.14/0.44 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 660 0.14/0.44 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.14/0.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 11 0.14/0.44 # Paramodulations : 760 0.14/0.44 # Factorizations : 0 0.14/0.44 # NegExts : 0 0.14/0.44 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.14/0.44 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.14/0.44 # Total rewrite steps : 286 0.14/0.44 # ...of those cached : 227 0.14/0.44 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.14/0.44 # Propositional check models : 0 0.14/0.44 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.14/0.44 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.14/0.44 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.14/0.44 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.14/0.44 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.14/0.44 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.14/0.44 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.14/0.44 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.14/0.44 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.14/0.44 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.14/0.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 214 0.14/0.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 64 0.14/0.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.14/0.44 # Negative unit clauses : 38 0.14/0.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 112 0.14/0.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 266 0.14/0.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 720 0.14/0.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.14/0.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 126 0.14/0.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5676 0.14/0.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3624 0.14/0.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 87 0.14/0.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 866 0.14/0.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.14/0.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 37 0.14/0.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 27 0.14/0.44 # Condensation attempts : 486 0.14/0.44 # Condensation successes : 0 0.14/0.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 15035 0.14/0.44 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1895 0.14/0.44 0.14/0.44 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.14/0.44 # User time : 0.033 s 0.14/0.44 # System time : 0.003 s 0.14/0.44 # Total time : 0.036 s 0.14/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 2352 pages 0.14/0.44 0.14/0.44 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.14/0.44 # User time : 0.035 s 0.14/0.44 # System time : 0.005 s 0.14/0.44 # Total time : 0.040 s 0.14/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1916 pages 0.14/0.44 % E exiting 0.14/0.44 % E exiting 0.14/0.44 EOF